Sunday, January 23, 2011

Fewer Synapses, More Efficient Learning: Molecular Glue Wires the Brain

Fewer Synapses, More Efficient Learning: Molecular Glue Wires the Brain

Yale University researchers have found that a single molecule not only connects brain cells but also changes how we learn. The findings, reported in the December 9 issue of the journal Neuron, may help researchers discover ways to improve memory and could lead to new therapies to correct neurological disorders.
The junctions between brain cells over which nerve pulses pass -- called synapses -- are crucial for regulating learning and memory and how we think. Aberrations in the structure and function of synapses have been linked to mental retardation and autism, while synapses are lost in the aging brains of Alzheimer's patients.
However, the mechanisms that organize synapses in the living brain remain a puzzle. Yale scientists identified one critical piece of this puzzle, a molecule called SynCAM 1 that spans across synaptic junctions.
"We hypothesized that this molecule might promote new synapses in the developing brain, but were surprised that it also impacts the maintenance and function of these structures," said Thomas Biederer, associate professor of molecular biophysics and biochemistry and senior author of the study. "We can now define how this molecule supports the brain's ability to wire itself."
The Yale team focused on SynCAM 1, an adhesion molecule that helps to hold synaptic junctions together. They found that when the SynCAM 1 gene was activated in mice, more synaptic connections formed. Mice without the molecule produced fewer synapses.
When we learn, new synapses can form. However, the strength of synaptic connections also changes during learning, based on the amount of stimuli received -- a quality scientists termed "plasticity." Together with a group in Germany led by Valentin Stein, the team was surprised to find that SynCAM 1 controls an important form of synaptic plasticity.
Unexpectedly, Biederer and colleagues also found that mice with high amounts of SynCAM 1 are unable to learn while mice lacking SynCAM 1 -- and having fewer synapses -- learn better. Apparently an excess of the molecule can be damaging. This builds on recent theories suggesting that having too many connections isn't always better and that the balance of synaptic activity is crucial for proper learning and memory.
"Synapses are dynamic structures. It appears that SynCAM 1 ties synapses together; some of this molecule is needed to promote contact but too much glues down the synapse and inhibits its function. It may act a bit like a sculptor who helps give synapses their shape." Biederer also said that the molecule is almost identical in mice and man, and likely has the same roles in human brains.


Other Yale authors on the paper are Elissa Robbins and Karen Perez de Arce.
The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the March of Dimes Foundation.
[source: ScienceDaily: Fewer Synapses, More Efficient Learning: Molecular Glue Wires the Brain (Dec. 9, 2010)]

share this story:
Share

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Entertainment

Memorize the spelling of Rectangle in the following languages:

English: Entertainment

French: Divertissement

German: Unterhaltungsprogramm

Spanish: Entretenimiento

Italian: Intrattenimento

Share

Objects in Picture One

Do you remember the objects depicted in Picture One? What are they?

Share

If not then again, review the following post until you would be asked again!

http://iymbas.blogspot.com/2010/01/picture-one.html

Simple recall exercises make science learning easier: Study

Simple recall exercises make science learning easier: Study

Putting down those science textbooks and working at recalling information from memory is the new way to boost science learning, suggests a new study.

The new research from Purdue University states that practicing memory retrieval boosts science learning far better than elaborate study methods.

"Our view is that learning is not about studying or getting knowledge 'in memory.' Learning is about retrieving. So it is important to make retrieval practice an integral part of the learning process," says Jeffrey Karpicke, the lead investigator of the study.

"In prior research, we established that practicing retrieval is a powerful way to improve learning. Here we put retrieval practice to the test by comparing its effectiveness to an elaborative study method, specifically elaborative studying by creating concept maps," he says.

Concept mapping requires students to construct a diagram-typically using nodes or bubbles-that shows relationships among ideas, characteristics or materials. These concepts are then written down as a way of encoding them in a person's memory.

The researchers say the practice is used extensively for learning about concepts in sciences such as biology, chemistry or physics.

In two studies, a total of 200 students studied texts on topics from different science disciplines. One group engaged in elaborative study using concept maps while a second group practiced retrieval; they read the texts, then put them away and practiced freely recalling concepts from the text.

Improve Memory

After an initial study period, both groups recalled about the same amount of information. But when the students returned to the lab a week later to assess their long-term learning, the group that studied by practicing retrieval showed a 50 percent improvement in long-term retention above the group that studied by creating concept maps.

Karpicke found that when students have the material right in front of them, they think they know it better than they actually do.

"It may be surprising to realize that there is such a disconnect between what students think will afford good learning and what is actually best. We, as educators, need to keep this in mind as we create learning tools and evaluate educational practices," he says.

The researchers showed retrieval practice was superior to elaborative studying in all comparisons.

"The final retention test was one of the most important features of our study, because we asked questions that tapped into meaningful learning," adds Karpicke.

The findings were published in the journal Science. (ANI)

source: Sify: Simple recall exercises make science learning easier: Study (2011-01-22)

Share

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Remember Numbers [One]

Review these 30 numbers for 4 minutes and try to memorize them! The order is not important for this practice. How the numbers are selected, were to be easy for memorizing.

  1. 1234
  2. 2233
  3. 2345
  4. 9876
  5. 1010
  6. 3331
  7. 1990
  8. 2011
  9. 5566
  10. 8181
  11. 2828
  12. 9080
  13. 1415
  14. 2222
  15. 7878
  16. 6555
  17. 4545
  18. 2332
  19. 4749
  20. 7777
  21. 1298
  22. 1870
  23. 1357
  24. 1112
  25. 2121
  26. 1919
  27. 2325
  28. 4748
  29. 3366
  30. 2525



Now, read the following paragraphs to spend some minutes before switching back to the above practice:

"One of the most significant aspects of proper review is the
accumulative effect it has on all aspects of learning, thinking and
remembering. The person who does not review is continually
wasting the effort he does put in to any learning task, and putting
himself at a serious disadvantage.
Each time he approaches a new learning situation his recall of
previous knowledge gained will be at a very low ebb, and the
connections which should be made automatically will be missed.
This will mean that his understanding of the new material will
not be as complete as it could be, and that his efficiency and
speed through the new material will also be less. This continuingly
negative process results in a downward spiral that ends
in a general despair of ever being able to learn anything - each
time new material is learned it is forgotten, and each time new
material is approached it seems to become more oppressive. The
result is that many people, after having finished their formal exams,
seldom, if ever, approach text books again.
Failure to review is equally as bad for general memory. If each
new piece of information is neglected, it will not remain at a conscious
level, and will not be available to form new memory connections.
As memory is a process which is based on linking and
association, the fewer items there are in the 'recall store', the less
will be the possibility for new items to be registered and connected.
On the opposite side of this coin, the advantages for the person
who does review are enormous. The more he maintains his
current body of knowledge, the more he will be able to absorb
and handle."
[sourceUse Your Head by Tony Buzan]:



Take a pen and paper; in 3 minutes, try to recall and write down the above numbers as many as you can; during this 3 minutes you should not be interrupted by any external or personal agents!



OK, now, check the numbers and give yourself +2 for each correct number you recalled, -1 for each wrong number you wrote and -2 for any number that you missed to write on the paper!

What is your total score?

51-60 Excellent!
41-50 Not too bad!
If less than 41 then you need to do the memory exercises more seriously! Spend more time on "Chain of Words", "Chain of Verbs" and "Chain of Names" exercises!

Share